Bring conversational intelligence into your meetings

Clarion joins the meeting as an AI conversational intelligence agent and analyzes how the conversation unfolds.

It organizes conversational signals and interaction patterns so the participants can review insights after the discussion and better understand what happened between them.

CivilTalk currently lists support for meetings held through:

• Zoom
• Google Meet
• Microsoft Teams

Each Clarion recording is currently limited to 90 minutes.

If your meeting continues beyond 90 minutes, you can launch a new Clarion recording and continue receiving insights and reporting.

There is no set limit on the number of meetings. Your available meeting-minute balance determines how much Clarion observation time you can use.

Clarion displays your remaining minutes so you can keep track of your available observation time.

Clarion can be useful in meetings and conversations where understanding communication patterns, viewpoints, areas of agreement, and moments of friction would help participants reflect and improve.

CivilTalk positions Clarion for organizational meetings and leadership conversations where communication quality can influence relationships, decisions, and outcomes.

No. Clarion acts as a neutral observer.

It does not determine who is right, enforce an outcome, or score one participant against another. Its role is to make conversational dynamics more visible so people can reflect and make their own decisions.

No. Clarion does not assess personality traits, mental health status, or a participant's internal emotional condition.

Its analysis focuses on observable conversational content, language, viewpoints, interaction tone, and communication patterns.

Position Detection identifies and organizes statements that reflect the viewpoints participants express during a conversation.

This can make it easier to understand what each participant is actually saying and where positions align or differ.

Consensus Building surfaces areas where participants express agreement or shared understanding.

Making those areas visible can help distinguish genuine disagreement from issues where participants may already have more common ground than they realized.

After the conversation, Clarion generates reporting designed to help participants reflect on conversational patterns and interaction dynamics.

The reports can highlight language patterns, civility and interaction tone, participant viewpoints, areas of agreement, and other communication patterns that may be useful for reflection.

Use Clarion as a reflection tool rather than as a scorecard. After a meeting, focus on the conversational patterns that seem most relevant to your goals.

Consider questions such as:

• Where did participants clearly understand one another?
• Where did viewpoints differ?
• Where did the conversation become less productive?
• What language helped move the discussion forward?
• Where did meaningful agreement emerge?
• What could you approach differently next time?